Merge pull request #3235 from freqtrade/xmatthias-patch-1
Be clear on evaluation logic during backtesting
This commit is contained in:
commit
fb0dfee3eb
@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ Since backtesting lacks some detailed information about what happens within a ca
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
- Buys happen at open-price
|
- Buys happen at open-price
|
||||||
- Sell signal sells happen at open-price of the following candle
|
- Sell signal sells happen at open-price of the following candle
|
||||||
- Low happens before high for stoploss, protecting capital first.
|
- Low happens before high for stoploss, protecting capital first
|
||||||
- ROI
|
- ROI
|
||||||
- sells are compared to high - but the ROI value is used (e.g. ROI = 2%, high=5% - so the sell will be at 2%)
|
- sells are compared to high - but the ROI value is used (e.g. ROI = 2%, high=5% - so the sell will be at 2%)
|
||||||
- sells are never "below the candle", so a ROI of 2% may result in a sell at 2.4% if low was at 2.4% profit
|
- sells are never "below the candle", so a ROI of 2% may result in a sell at 2.4% if low was at 2.4% profit
|
||||||
@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ Since backtesting lacks some detailed information about what happens within a ca
|
|||||||
- High happens first - adjusting stoploss
|
- High happens first - adjusting stoploss
|
||||||
- Low uses the adjusted stoploss (so sells with large high-low difference are backtested correctly)
|
- Low uses the adjusted stoploss (so sells with large high-low difference are backtested correctly)
|
||||||
- Sell-reason does not explain if a trade was positive or negative, just what triggered the sell (this can look odd if negative ROI values are used)
|
- Sell-reason does not explain if a trade was positive or negative, just what triggered the sell (this can look odd if negative ROI values are used)
|
||||||
|
- Stoploss (and trailing stoploss) is evaluated before ROI within one candle. So you can often see more trades with the `stoploss` and/or `trailing_stop` sell reason comparing to the results obtained with the same strategy in the Dry Run/Live Trade modes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Taking these assumptions, backtesting tries to mirror real trading as closely as possible. However, backtesting will **never** replace running a strategy in dry-run mode.
|
Taking these assumptions, backtesting tries to mirror real trading as closely as possible. However, backtesting will **never** replace running a strategy in dry-run mode.
|
||||||
Also, keep in mind that past results don't guarantee future success.
|
Also, keep in mind that past results don't guarantee future success.
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user