Files
konstruct/.planning/phases/04-rbac/04-CONTEXT.md

6.0 KiB

Phase 4: RBAC - Context

Gathered: 2026-03-24 Status: Ready for planning

## Phase Boundary

Three-tier role-based access control for the Konstruct portal: platform admin (full SaaS management), customer admin (tenant-scoped full control), and customer operator (read-only + test messages). Includes email invitation flow for tenant user onboarding, role-based portal navigation, API authorization enforcement, and platform admin capabilities (impersonation, global user management).

## Implementation Decisions

Role Definitions & Boundaries

  • Platform admin: Full access to all tenants, all agents, all users, platform settings. Uses the same portal with elevated access (no separate admin panel).
  • Customer admin: Full control over their tenant — agents (CRUD), channels, billing (self-service via Stripe), BYO API keys, user management (invite/remove users). Can manage multiple tenants (agency/reseller use case).
  • Customer operator: View agents, view conversations, view usage dashboards, send test messages to agents. Cannot create/edit/delete agents, no billing access, no API key management, no user management. Fixed role — granular permissions deferred to v2.
  • Operators can send test messages to agents — useful for QA without giving edit access.
  • Customer admins manage their own billing (subscribe, upgrade, cancel) — self-service, not admin-gated.
  • Customer admins manage their own BYO API keys — self-service.

Invitation & Onboarding Flow

  • Customer admin creates user in portal (name, email, role selection: admin or operator)
  • System sends invite email via SMTP direct (no third-party transactional email service)
  • Invite link valid for 48 hours — expired links show a clear message
  • Customer admin can resend expired invites with a new 48-hour window (resend button on pending invites list)
  • All user creation goes through the invite flow — even platform admins must use invites, no direct account creation with temporary passwords. Consistent and auditable.
  • Activation page: Claude's discretion (set password only recommended — minimal friction)

Portal Experience Per Role

  • Role-specific landing pages after login:
    • Platform admin → platform overview (all tenants, global stats)
    • Customer admin → tenant dashboard (their agents, usage summary)
    • Customer operator → agent list (read-only view of their tenant's agents)
  • Users with multiple tenants get a tenant switcher dropdown in the sidebar/header — switch without logging out
  • Restricted nav items are hidden (not disabled/grayed) — operators don't see Billing, API Keys, User Management in sidebar
  • Unauthorized URL access (e.g., operator navigates to /billing) → silent redirect to their home dashboard (no 403 error page)
  • API endpoints return 403 Forbidden for unauthorized actions — defense in depth, not just hidden UI

Platform Admin Capabilities

  • Impersonation: platform admin can "view as" a tenant — all impersonation actions logged in audit trail
  • Global user management page: see all users across all tenants, filter by tenant/role, manage invites
  • Platform admin sees the same portal as customers but with elevated access and a tenant picker (existing from Phase 1)

Claude's Discretion

  • Activation page design (set password only vs full profile setup)
  • Invite email template content and styling
  • SMTP configuration approach (env vars vs portal settings)
  • Impersonation UI pattern (banner at top, dropdown, etc.)
  • How role is stored in JWT (claim name, encoding)
  • Database schema for user-tenant association (join table vs embedded)
  • Tenant switcher dropdown visual design
## Specific Ideas
  • The invite flow should feel professional — "You've been invited to join [Tenant Name] on Konstruct" not generic SaaS boilerplate
  • Impersonation should have a clear visual indicator so the admin knows they're viewing as a customer (and can exit easily)
  • The tenant switcher should feel instant — no page reload, just context switch
  • Operators seeing test message capability makes the role feel useful, not just a "lesser" version of admin

<code_context>

Existing Code Insights

Reusable Assets

  • packages/shared/shared/models/auth.py:PortalUser — Existing user model with is_admin flag. Needs: role enum field, tenant association (many-to-many for multi-tenant support)
  • packages/portal/lib/auth.ts — Auth.js v5 with JWT callback passing is_admin. Needs: pass role + tenant_id instead, add tenant_ids for multi-tenant users
  • packages/shared/shared/api/portal.py — Auth verify + register endpoints. Needs: role-aware responses, invitation endpoints
  • packages/portal/components/nav.tsx — Sidebar navigation. Needs: role-based item filtering
  • packages/shared/shared/models/audit.py:AuditEvent — Immutable audit trail. Reuse for impersonation logging.

Established Patterns

  • Auth.js v5 JWT strategy — role/tenant info goes in JWT claims, no DB session lookup per request
  • FastAPI dependency injection — add role-checking dependencies (Depends(require_platform_admin), Depends(require_tenant_admin))
  • PostgreSQL RLS — tenant isolation already enforced at DB level, RBAC is additive authorization on top
  • Portal uses TanStack Query — role-filtered API calls will update automatically

Integration Points

  • Every existing API endpoint needs authorization middleware (currently no auth checks beyond login)
  • Portal proxy.ts needs to pass role/tenant from JWT to server components
  • Agent Designer, billing, API keys pages need role guards
  • New pages needed: user management (per-tenant + global), invite acceptance

</code_context>

## Deferred Ideas
  • Granular operator permissions (configurable by customer admin) — v2 RBAC enhancement
  • SSO/SAML for enterprise tenants — future authentication method
  • Activity log visible to customer admins (who did what in their tenant) — separate observability phase

Phase: 04-rbac Context gathered: 2026-03-24