Update leverage tier terminology to be clear and aligned with ccxt
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2316,10 +2316,10 @@ class Exchange:
|
||||
def parse_leverage_tier(self, tier) -> Dict:
|
||||
info = tier.get('info', {})
|
||||
return {
|
||||
'min': tier['minNotional'],
|
||||
'max': tier['maxNotional'],
|
||||
'mmr': tier['maintenanceMarginRate'],
|
||||
'lev': tier['maxLeverage'],
|
||||
'minNotional': tier['minNotional'],
|
||||
'maxNotional': tier['maxNotional'],
|
||||
'maintenanceMarginRate': tier['maintenanceMarginRate'],
|
||||
'maxLeverage': tier['maxLeverage'],
|
||||
'maintAmt': float(info['cum']) if 'cum' in info else None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2348,18 +2348,18 @@ class Exchange:
|
||||
pair_tiers = self._leverage_tiers[pair]
|
||||
|
||||
if stake_amount == 0:
|
||||
return self._leverage_tiers[pair][0]['lev'] # Max lev for lowest amount
|
||||
return self._leverage_tiers[pair][0]['maxLeverage'] # Max lev for lowest amount
|
||||
|
||||
for tier_index in range(len(pair_tiers)):
|
||||
|
||||
tier = pair_tiers[tier_index]
|
||||
lev = tier['lev']
|
||||
lev = tier['maxLeverage']
|
||||
|
||||
if tier_index < len(pair_tiers) - 1:
|
||||
next_tier = pair_tiers[tier_index + 1]
|
||||
next_floor = next_tier['min'] / next_tier['lev']
|
||||
next_floor = next_tier['minNotional'] / next_tier['maxLeverage']
|
||||
if next_floor > stake_amount: # Next tier min too high for stake amount
|
||||
return min((tier['max'] / stake_amount), lev)
|
||||
return min((tier['maxNotional'] / stake_amount), lev)
|
||||
#
|
||||
# With the two leverage tiers below,
|
||||
# - a stake amount of 150 would mean a max leverage of (10000 / 150) = 66.66
|
||||
@@ -2380,10 +2380,11 @@ class Exchange:
|
||||
#
|
||||
|
||||
else: # if on the last tier
|
||||
if stake_amount > tier['max']: # If stake is > than max tradeable amount
|
||||
if stake_amount > tier['maxNotional']:
|
||||
# If stake is > than max tradeable amount
|
||||
raise InvalidOrderException(f'Amount {stake_amount} too high for {pair}')
|
||||
else:
|
||||
return tier['lev']
|
||||
return tier['maxLeverage']
|
||||
|
||||
raise OperationalException(
|
||||
'Looped through all tiers without finding a max leverage. Should never be reached'
|
||||
@@ -2749,8 +2750,8 @@ class Exchange:
|
||||
pair_tiers = self._leverage_tiers[pair]
|
||||
|
||||
for tier in reversed(pair_tiers):
|
||||
if nominal_value >= tier['min']:
|
||||
return (tier['mmr'], tier['maintAmt'])
|
||||
if nominal_value >= tier['minNotional']:
|
||||
return (tier['maintenanceMarginRate'], tier['maintAmt'])
|
||||
|
||||
raise OperationalException("nominal value can not be lower than 0")
|
||||
# The lowest notional_floor for any pair in fetch_leverage_tiers is always 0 because it
|
||||
|
@@ -146,4 +146,4 @@ class Okx(Exchange):
|
||||
return float('inf')
|
||||
|
||||
pair_tiers = self._leverage_tiers[pair]
|
||||
return pair_tiers[-1]['max'] / leverage
|
||||
return pair_tiers[-1]['maxNotional'] / leverage
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user