Fix backtesting format since sublist does not render correctly
This commit is contained in:
parent
93b213ae0b
commit
0adcee9233
@ -199,9 +199,8 @@ Since backtesting lacks some detailed information about what happens within a ca
|
|||||||
- Low happens before high for stoploss, protecting capital first.
|
- Low happens before high for stoploss, protecting capital first.
|
||||||
- ROI sells are compared to high - but the ROI value is used (e.g. ROI = 2%, high=5% - so the sell will be at 2%)
|
- ROI sells are compared to high - but the ROI value is used (e.g. ROI = 2%, high=5% - so the sell will be at 2%)
|
||||||
- Stoploss sells happen exactly at stoploss price, even if low was lower
|
- Stoploss sells happen exactly at stoploss price, even if low was lower
|
||||||
- Trailing stoploss
|
- Trailing stoploss: High happens first - adjusting stoploss
|
||||||
- High happens first - adjusting stoploss
|
- Trailing stoploss: Low uses the adjusted stoploss (so sells with large high-low difference are backtested correctly)
|
||||||
- Low uses the adjusted stoploss (so sells with large high-low difference are backtested correctly)
|
|
||||||
- Sell-reason does not explain if a trade was positive or negative, just what triggered the sell (this can look odd if negative ROI values are used)
|
- Sell-reason does not explain if a trade was positive or negative, just what triggered the sell (this can look odd if negative ROI values are used)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Taking these assumptions, backtesting tries to mirror real trading as closely as possible. However, backtesting will **never** replace running a strategy in dry-run mode.
|
Taking these assumptions, backtesting tries to mirror real trading as closely as possible. However, backtesting will **never** replace running a strategy in dry-run mode.
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user